Monday, December 31, 2007

No more blame it on Al-Qaida

I am so happy that Benazir Bhutto's supporters and aides did not buy the official story of the Pakistani interior ministry that the Al-Qaida and Taliban were responsible of the attack

And I am even happier more than ever to know that Taliban denied any responsibility of the Attack

People are buying anymore from this Al-Qaida-Taliban bogy man , it is too obvious why she was killed and who was behind her murder

The suicide bomber is surely from the radical brainwashed groups , already these guys are only the end of the snake tail that can be cut easily and the snake will still be alive

The Radical groups here are just the means that fulfills the interests of the masters in the back stage. Already do not forget who made them in the first place !!??

Benazir Bhutto's assassination is just like President Sadaat's assassination.

Al-Qaida and Taliban according to the Ex-head of Pakistani intelligence during Benazir's cabinets Hamid Gul are not suspects, already despite the big threats she said against those two groups yet they won't get any benefit from killing it , first of all she had actually good relations with Taliban and the tribes men according to whom to Gul who is famous for work with the C.I.A and the Taliban during the late 1980s .

In the last 48 hours I read couple of theories about the Bhutto's assassination and they worth listening and discussing

The most clear suspect here is General Musharraf who can't stand the idea that this woman could have regained power again and thus stripping it away from him.

Musharraf knew that America does not want him despite the fact he was and is still their good ally , but unfortunately America does not want a dictator in the size of Musharraf the people can't stand him anymore ,the golden lesson of the Iranian revolution made them learn not to put their bets on losing horses . Benazir  was a winning horse and so she went back to Pakistan with an American support ,no body denies this and she did not deny , the Americans want her as a popular figure to rule the country in the free elections and she could have won despite the fact Nawaz Sherif returned back and there are other parties in the Pakistani scene

Musharraf could have got rid  from her to clear the scene from any possible rival , yes Nawaz is still there but he does not the same popularity outside and inside like Bhutto. Musharraf could have got rid from her in order to send a message to the Americans saying "Sorry Dear you have to deal with me now" and I think the Americans have got and understood very well and acted accordingly to the reality that they have to deal with him now even temporarily till they found another substitute,the evidence on that is the mainstream in America and the west are repeating that she was killed By Al-Qaida and by the radical groups whom she used to attack violently

Unfortunately if Musharraf was behind the assassination ,he will pay a lot and he is already paying the country is entering the complete chaos zone , in the North the Pakistan Taliban is control that area , in the south and in the middle you got violence and riots because of Bhutto's absence and the increasing anger of the people from the current regime there.Ironically many of the Bhutto's supporters are saying in the protests publicly "Musharraf killed Benazir" .I saw a protest on BBC world News and I was surprised to find out the verb of Kill in Arab is used as it is also in Pakistan in Urdu , I did not need any translation to understand what those angry messes were saying

The Chaos Zone ,the Zone with no return can lead us to the next suspect : The United States , Yes I know it is shocking for you after all Bhutto was her ally why she would get rid of her , simply to accelerate their scenario in Pakistan to become the living example of their Creative Chaos theory 

First of all you must put in mind  that Pakistan is more than important country in the region and it is suffering from the terrorism hurricane and this fancy talk , Pakistan is a nuclear power , the first Muslim country with Nuclear power , with Nuclear bombs and weaponry and they do not hide and they proud of it , America and behind it Israel do not want any Arabic or Muslim Nuclear power in the region except Israel. No body is speaking about the Pakistani program but still it is on their list

General Gul spoke about an American plan in order to weaken the country till they will be able to invade like Iraq , a theory in a Perfect world can't be accepted but because we do not live in a Perfect world you must listen to all theories

8 comments:

  1. Dear Zenobia
    Please try to wach/listen to this film. May be you can bring it in you blog. Best regards
    ADB

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe0f4gyfjBE

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear anonymous,I know about the film and the inciden since the Eid when Wael published it and I asked Wael about it ,just wait couple of days and you will find something about it

    ReplyDelete
  3. "..the golden lesson of the Iranian revolution made them learn not to put their bets on losing horses"

    Strangely the USA still seems to be hedging their bets on Hosni & Sons Inc. despite the incredible unpopularity of this regime locally. Ayman Nour could have been some sort of a viable palatable alternative for the Americans but about him.

    I think you hit the nail on the head at the end of your article. Much like I said before, slowly slowly the region is being destabilized. Country by country. And yes, these are all countries with predominantly MUSLIM populations. Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and eventually I'm sure Iran will be the next target as it's blatantly on the hit list.

    Between the natural resources and the nuclear programs, these muslim countries are being closely watched and perhaps slowly but surely destabilized. Let's hope this doesn't happen to Egypt. The Israelis are not the peace loving treaty signers they pretend to be.

    It makes no difference which political party wins in the 2008 elections in the USA. The lobby groups have taken control of congress and the senate. I don't know if I would call it real democracy if special interest groups are controlling how politicians vote and what bill should be raised and passed.

    In any event, one would hope that the Pakistani people would wake up and see what's going on around them. Benazir Bhutto had her own agenda i'm sure and she was the American candidate for the elections. Like you always say where there is smoke there is fire and the allegations of corrupttion followed her like a plague despite her popularity. If you ask me, all of these Pakistani leaders are just out to increase their own pockets and get bigger shares of the pie.

    At the end of the day, it's only the common man and the everyday woman that suffers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Video on youtube isn't working. ONLY audio but it doesn't sound good.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Indeed so funny! As far as I know, and as it is well acknowledged by Iranians before Americans- Iran allied itself with the invading Americans. On the ground, the Iranian Iraqis supported by Iranian intelligence are persiansing the spouth of Iraq killing Secualrs, scientists, academics and the Iraqi pilots and heroes who defeated Iran in 1988.


    Both Sunni Shiite Arab are calling upon the Arab nation to cut off the hands Iranians from Iraq.


    Americans Attack Iran!!!!havent you heard about the recent negotiations beyween the Americans and the mullahs of Tehran?



    "the golden lesson of the Iranian revolution made them learn not to put their bets on losing horses"


    The golden lesson is that Arabs particularly Iraqis must build a very high fence with the Iranian enemy.

    The war exposed the unholly between Americans Israelians, Iranians( both the Shah and Khomeini) . They all had one common clear enemy a progressive enlightened well- integrated or united Arab world; since it would turn upside down the world order and shift the centres of power to the Nile Euphrates line.

    Iranian revolution brought Arabs nothing but wars and relentless attempts to topple the most successful and progressive Arab state in the 20th century- Iraq's Saddam.

    Days have proven the long vision of the martyr president Saddam Hussein as the Iranian occupation forces arriving with Americans have wrecked havoc everywhere venting out their grudge on everything Arabic.


    "The Israelis are not the peace loving treaty signers they pretend to be".

    Are you aware of what you have been saying. weren't the Iranians buying arms from Israel to kill Iraqis during the war of agression against Iraq????

    ReplyDelete
  6. drasnen = racoon= amre

    How tedious and REPETITIVE you are!

    You are Officially Boring!

    ReplyDelete
  7. DRASEN = Racoon = AMRE

    How tedious and REPETITIVE you are!

    You have become OFFICIALLY BORING!

    Don't you get tired of saying the same thing over and over and over and over. Broken record or what!

    ReplyDelete
  8. @anonymous#1, Who told you that they are betting on Mubarak and son only surely they got other communications with other parties like MB whether in the past or now , they must have someone on the back and so they will hold more power papers against the current regime
    Of course the current regime can play its own dirty game and get rid some of those power papers especially it is powerful like the EGyptian regime and what they did with Ayman Nour and Pervez Vs. Benazir
    you right about the rest and agree , Benazir was not the best same as Ayman Nour still America some times just like in Iran does not want to depend on dictators all the time because in the end they lose everything
    and yes from experince there is no huge difference between the democrats and republicans regarding the MIddle east , still now things are getting worse with Neo-cons
    @anonymous #2, it is an audio clip ,already I will explain what it is later
    @Drasen , it is wonderful that you left all what I am speaking about and only took one phrase , I think I am right about it with my all respect now the U.S is the greatest Satan of the world in Iran after being the best ally ever and if you are going to tell me about the American weapons to Iran ,I will tell that America used to sell to both Parties

    @anonymous#3 he does not give up

    ReplyDelete

Thank You for your comment
Please keep it civilized here, racist and hateful comments are not accepted
The Comments in this blog with exclusion of the blog's owner does not represent the views of the blog's owner.